Prompt 01
01 · Opportunity & micro-niche discovery
ROLE
Act as an evidence-led micro-business opportunity analyst for the Stag Vault track “Community Council Minutes & Public-Notice Service”.
EDITABLE VARIABLES
[YOUR NICHE] = the narrow sector, product category or use case to target
[TARGET CUSTOMER] = the exact buyer role and organisation/customer type
[LOCATION] = UK region, country or global market
[BUSINESS TYPE] = productised service, digital product, subscription, licence or hybrid
[PRODUCT] = the named deliverable or offer
[PRICE] = price hypothesis to validate, not an assumed market fact
[PLATFORM] = selling, delivery, CRM, storefront or automation platform
[EXPERIENCE LEVEL] = beginner, intermediate or advanced
[AVAILABLE BUDGET] = cash available before validation
[AVAILABLE HOURS] = realistic hours per week
[BRAND NAME] = working business/offer name
[TONE] = plain-English, expert, reassuring, direct, warm or other lawful tone
[GOAL] = the measurable customer or business result to pursue
TRACK-SPECIFIC BUSINESS BRIEF
Opportunity: An AI-assisted operational service drafting agendas, minutes from recordings, public notices, consultation summaries and website updates for community and parish councils, with human review and confidentiality controls.
Who it is for: Organised writers, ex-clerks and admins comfortable with recordings.
What is sold: Agenda drafting, minutes from recordings, public notices, consultation summaries, website posts, monthly bundle.
Buyer: Community councils, parish councils, residents' associations
Where it is sold: Council association networks, clerks' forums, local government LinkedIn, direct email to councils.
Startup cost: £0–£100 | Time to launch: 1–2 weeks
Revenue model: £99 pilot meeting, £149–299/mo retainer, project consultations extra. | Activity model: ACTIVE · recurring
Why now: Volunteer clerks are scarce and statutory publication duties keep growing; councils will pay a modest monthly fee for reliable admin.
Differentiation: Recurring B2B admin service with governance awareness; not a news product.
First-customer route: Minute one council meeting free, deliver within 48h, propose the retainer.
OBJECTIVE
Select the strongest narrow buyer/use-case combination for this business without drifting into a generic agency or product.
INFORMATION TO ANALYSE
Use only evidence I paste, clearly named public sources, client-approved material and the following track-specific research plan:
Use official guidance, sector bodies, public reviews and 5–8 buyer interviews for community councils; date-stamp rules and mark unverified items [VERIFY].
If evidence is missing, produce a collection plan and [VERIFY] fields instead of guessing.
TRACK-SPECIFIC EXECUTION DIRECTION
Prioritise community councils; score sub-niches by urgency of the trigger event, buyer access and how badly current options serve them.
STEPS TO FOLLOW
1. Generate 12 combinations of buyer × trigger/problem × deliverable. 2. Score each for urgency, access to buyer, evidence availability, frequency, budget, delivery risk and repeatability. 3. Identify UK and global variants. 4. Reject regulated or high-liability versions the operator cannot safely serve. 5. Select one lead micro-niche and two controlled alternatives. 6. Define what would disprove the opportunity within 48 hours.
REQUIRED OUTPUT
A ranked 12-row niche table; one lead niche; ideal-customer snapshot; buying trigger list; market-evidence gaps; red-flag/rejection list; and a one-sentence commercial thesis.
Present the work in copyable tables, scripts, templates, checklists and action-plan blocks. Fill known variables and leave unknown variables visibly labelled.
TRACK-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE / QUALITY BOUNDARY
Confidentiality agreements required; handle personal data lawfully; councils approve all minutes; not legal advice on procedures.
KPI SET
Track: pilot conversions, delivery time, client satisfaction, upgrade rate, recurring retention, referrals
STAG VAULT CROSS-SELLS
Reference these existing resources where useful rather than recreating them: Track 128 Executive Assistant Service, Track 69 Local-News Substack, Track 190 Trustee Governance Packs.
NON-NEGOTIABLE RULES
- Never invent live demand, traffic, sales, conversion rates, prices, laws, platform rules, testimonials or customer evidence. Mark unknowns [VERIFY] and give the exact source or experiment needed.
- Treat First £100 / £500 / £1,000 figures as operating milestones, not forecasts or guarantees. Separate revenue, costs, tax, refunds and owner time.
- Use public, permissioned or client-supplied information only. Do not scrape behind logins, expose personal data, impersonate professionals or bypass platform terms.
- Keep a human approval gate for legal, privacy, safeguarding, health, finance, security, regulatory and customer-facing decisions. This system organises and drafts; it does not certify compliance or replace a qualified professional.
- Make every deliverable specific to the stated buyer, niche and evidence. Reject generic filler, copied competitors, fake proof, spam outreach and vanity metrics.
- Prioritise a cheap validation test before a full build. Stop or revise when the pre-agreed evidence threshold is not reached.
Finish with one 30-minute next action, the evidence needed to unlock the next stage, and a short “What to avoid” list specific to this business.Prompt 02
02 · Competitor, substitute & evidence gap analysis
ROLE
Act as a commercial research analyst who distinguishes sourced facts from hypotheses for the Stag Vault track “Community Council Minutes & Public-Notice Service”.
EDITABLE VARIABLES
[YOUR NICHE] = the narrow sector, product category or use case to target
[TARGET CUSTOMER] = the exact buyer role and organisation/customer type
[LOCATION] = UK region, country or global market
[BUSINESS TYPE] = productised service, digital product, subscription, licence or hybrid
[PRODUCT] = the named deliverable or offer
[PRICE] = price hypothesis to validate, not an assumed market fact
[PLATFORM] = selling, delivery, CRM, storefront or automation platform
[EXPERIENCE LEVEL] = beginner, intermediate or advanced
[AVAILABLE BUDGET] = cash available before validation
[AVAILABLE HOURS] = realistic hours per week
[BRAND NAME] = working business/offer name
[TONE] = plain-English, expert, reassuring, direct, warm or other lawful tone
[GOAL] = the measurable customer or business result to pursue
TRACK-SPECIFIC BUSINESS BRIEF
Opportunity: An AI-assisted operational service drafting agendas, minutes from recordings, public notices, consultation summaries and website updates for community and parish councils, with human review and confidentiality controls.
Who it is for: Organised writers, ex-clerks and admins comfortable with recordings.
What is sold: Agenda drafting, minutes from recordings, public notices, consultation summaries, website posts, monthly bundle.
Buyer: Community councils, parish councils, residents' associations
Where it is sold: Council association networks, clerks' forums, local government LinkedIn, direct email to councils.
Startup cost: £0–£100 | Time to launch: 1–2 weeks
Revenue model: £99 pilot meeting, £149–299/mo retainer, project consultations extra. | Activity model: ACTIVE · recurring
Why now: Volunteer clerks are scarce and statutory publication duties keep growing; councils will pay a modest monthly fee for reliable admin.
Differentiation: Recurring B2B admin service with governance awareness; not a news product.
First-customer route: Minute one council meeting free, deliver within 48h, propose the retainer.
OBJECTIVE
Map direct competitors, DIY substitutes, software alternatives and visible buyer gaps before the offer is built.
INFORMATION TO ANALYSE
Use only evidence I paste, clearly named public sources, client-approved material and the following track-specific research plan:
Use official guidance, sector bodies, public reviews and 5–8 buyer interviews for community councils; date-stamp rules and mark unverified items [VERIFY].
If evidence is missing, produce a collection plan and [VERIFY] fields instead of guessing.
TRACK-SPECIFIC EXECUTION DIRECTION
Use official guidance, sector bodies, public reviews and 5–8 buyer interviews for community councils; date-stamp rules and mark unverified items [VERIFY].
STEPS TO FOLLOW
1. Create a manual research plan across search, marketplaces, software directories, LinkedIn, trade groups and buyer communities. 2. Ask me to paste live findings. 3. Compare offer, buyer, price, proof, turnaround, scope, recurring model and complaints. 4. Identify where buyers currently use spreadsheets, agencies, internal staff or do nothing. 5. Rank gaps by evidence and ease of serving. 6. Produce a defendable differentiation statement without claiming to be the only provider.
REQUIRED OUTPUT
A 15-competitor/substitute matrix; dated source log; review/pain pattern table; five white-space hypotheses; and a shortlist of three differentiators to test.
Present the work in copyable tables, scripts, templates, checklists and action-plan blocks. Fill known variables and leave unknown variables visibly labelled.
TRACK-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE / QUALITY BOUNDARY
Confidentiality agreements required; handle personal data lawfully; councils approve all minutes; not legal advice on procedures.
KPI SET
Track: pilot conversions, delivery time, client satisfaction, upgrade rate, recurring retention, referrals
STAG VAULT CROSS-SELLS
Reference these existing resources where useful rather than recreating them: Track 128 Executive Assistant Service, Track 69 Local-News Substack, Track 190 Trustee Governance Packs.
NON-NEGOTIABLE RULES
- Never invent live demand, traffic, sales, conversion rates, prices, laws, platform rules, testimonials or customer evidence. Mark unknowns [VERIFY] and give the exact source or experiment needed.
- Treat First £100 / £500 / £1,000 figures as operating milestones, not forecasts or guarantees. Separate revenue, costs, tax, refunds and owner time.
- Use public, permissioned or client-supplied information only. Do not scrape behind logins, expose personal data, impersonate professionals or bypass platform terms.
- Keep a human approval gate for legal, privacy, safeguarding, health, finance, security, regulatory and customer-facing decisions. This system organises and drafts; it does not certify compliance or replace a qualified professional.
- Make every deliverable specific to the stated buyer, niche and evidence. Reject generic filler, copied competitors, fake proof, spam outreach and vanity metrics.
- Prioritise a cheap validation test before a full build. Stop or revise when the pre-agreed evidence threshold is not reached.
Finish with one 30-minute next action, the evidence needed to unlock the next stage, and a short “What to avoid” list specific to this business.