Prompt 01
01 · Opportunity & micro-niche discovery
ROLE
Act as an evidence-led micro-business opportunity analyst for the Stag Vault track “Supplier ESG Answer Vault Studio”.
EDITABLE VARIABLES
[YOUR NICHE] = the narrow sector, product category or use case to target
[TARGET CUSTOMER] = the exact buyer role and organisation/customer type
[LOCATION] = UK region, country or global market
[BUSINESS TYPE] = productised service, digital product, subscription, licence or hybrid
[PRODUCT] = the named deliverable or offer
[PRICE] = price hypothesis to validate, not an assumed market fact
[PLATFORM] = selling, delivery, CRM, storefront or automation platform
[EXPERIENCE LEVEL] = beginner, intermediate or advanced
[AVAILABLE BUDGET] = cash available before validation
[AVAILABLE HOURS] = realistic hours per week
[BRAND NAME] = working business/offer name
[TONE] = plain-English, expert, reassuring, direct, warm or other lawful tone
[GOAL] = the measurable customer or business result to pursue
TRACK-SPECIFIC BUSINESS BRIEF
Opportunity: A B2B evidence service for SMEs repeatedly asked for sustainability, workforce and governance information by larger customers. It builds a VSME-informed source library, answer provenance, owner map and annual refresh—without inventing emissions, certifying ESG performance or replacing an accountant/sustainability specialist.
Who it is for: Research- and spreadsheet-confident operators who can coordinate evidence across finance, HR, facilities and procurement.
What is sold: Sourced sustainability fact library, questionnaire answer vault, evidence index, gap/owner tracker, response workflow and annual data refresh.
Buyer: UK/EU-facing SME suppliers that answer enterprise procurement, CSRD/VSME or customer ESG questionnaires.
Where it is sold: Accountants, sustainability advisers, procurement consultants, trade bodies, LinkedIn and supplier-development programmes.
Startup cost: £25–£100 | Time to launch: 1–2 weeks
Revenue model: Initial fact-library build plus annual/quarterly update and per-questionnaire support. | Activity model: ACTIVE with recurring annual updates
Why now: SME suppliers face repeated sustainability data requests while VSME and value-chain rules are pushing the market toward proportionate, reusable evidence structures.
Differentiation: Focuses on source-controlled answers and efficient reuse; it does not calculate unverifiable footprints, assure reports or sell generic ESG policies.
First-customer route: Create a 20-field synthetic fact-library sample and ask trade-body members or accountant clients which buyer questionnaires repeat most often.
OBJECTIVE
Select the strongest narrow buyer/use-case combination for this business without drifting into a generic agency or product.
INFORMATION TO ANALYSE
Use only evidence I paste, clearly named public sources, client-approved material and the following track-specific research plan:
Use current EFRAG VSME material, EU/UK procurement requirements, buyer questionnaires supplied by clients, utility invoices, HR records, policies and qualified carbon/accounting work. Keep source/date/owner for every answer.
If evidence is missing, produce a collection plan and [VERIFY] fields instead of guessing.
TRACK-SPECIFIC EXECUTION DIRECTION
Select sectors supplying larger buyers with recurring questionnaires and fragmented evidence. Rank by questionnaire frequency, value of contracts, evidence accessibility, specialist support and repeatability.
STEPS TO FOLLOW
1. Generate 12 combinations of buyer × trigger/problem × deliverable. 2. Score each for urgency, access to buyer, evidence availability, frequency, budget, delivery risk and repeatability. 3. Identify UK and global variants. 4. Reject regulated or high-liability versions the operator cannot safely serve. 5. Select one lead micro-niche and two controlled alternatives. 6. Define what would disprove the opportunity within 48 hours.
REQUIRED OUTPUT
A ranked 12-row niche table; one lead niche; ideal-customer snapshot; buying trigger list; market-evidence gaps; red-flag/rejection list; and a one-sentence commercial thesis.
Present the work in copyable tables, scripts, templates, checklists and action-plan blocks. Fill known variables and leave unknown variables visibly labelled.
TRACK-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE / QUALITY BOUNDARY
Do not calculate or assure emissions without qualified methods, invent ESG claims, greenwash, or state compliance. Handle commercially sensitive and workforce data securely and obtain client approval before answering buyers.
KPI SET
Track: paid libraries, questionnaires mapped, approved answers reused, completion time reduced, gaps closed, annual renewals, adviser referrals and unsupported claims prevented
STAG VAULT CROSS-SELLS
Reference these existing resources where useful rather than recreating them: Track 58 Compliance Calendar, Track 108 Corporate RFP Writer, Track 136 Supplier Onboarding and Track 44 Niche Data Vaults.
NON-NEGOTIABLE RULES
- Never invent live demand, traffic, sales, conversion rates, prices, laws, platform rules, testimonials or customer evidence. Mark unknowns [VERIFY] and give the exact source or experiment needed.
- Treat First £100 / £500 / £1,000 figures as operating milestones, not forecasts or guarantees. Separate revenue, costs, tax, refunds and owner time.
- Use public, permissioned or client-supplied information only. Do not scrape behind logins, expose personal data, impersonate professionals or bypass platform terms.
- Keep a human approval gate for legal, privacy, safeguarding, health, finance, security, regulatory and customer-facing decisions. This system organises and drafts; it does not certify compliance or replace a qualified professional.
- Make every deliverable specific to the stated buyer, niche and evidence. Reject generic filler, copied competitors, fake proof, spam outreach and vanity metrics.
- Prioritise a cheap validation test before a full build. Stop or revise when the pre-agreed evidence threshold is not reached.
Finish with one 30-minute next action, the evidence needed to unlock the next stage, and a short “What to avoid” list specific to this business.Prompt 02
02 · Competitor, substitute & evidence gap analysis
ROLE
Act as a commercial research analyst who distinguishes sourced facts from hypotheses for the Stag Vault track “Supplier ESG Answer Vault Studio”.
EDITABLE VARIABLES
[YOUR NICHE] = the narrow sector, product category or use case to target
[TARGET CUSTOMER] = the exact buyer role and organisation/customer type
[LOCATION] = UK region, country or global market
[BUSINESS TYPE] = productised service, digital product, subscription, licence or hybrid
[PRODUCT] = the named deliverable or offer
[PRICE] = price hypothesis to validate, not an assumed market fact
[PLATFORM] = selling, delivery, CRM, storefront or automation platform
[EXPERIENCE LEVEL] = beginner, intermediate or advanced
[AVAILABLE BUDGET] = cash available before validation
[AVAILABLE HOURS] = realistic hours per week
[BRAND NAME] = working business/offer name
[TONE] = plain-English, expert, reassuring, direct, warm or other lawful tone
[GOAL] = the measurable customer or business result to pursue
TRACK-SPECIFIC BUSINESS BRIEF
Opportunity: A B2B evidence service for SMEs repeatedly asked for sustainability, workforce and governance information by larger customers. It builds a VSME-informed source library, answer provenance, owner map and annual refresh—without inventing emissions, certifying ESG performance or replacing an accountant/sustainability specialist.
Who it is for: Research- and spreadsheet-confident operators who can coordinate evidence across finance, HR, facilities and procurement.
What is sold: Sourced sustainability fact library, questionnaire answer vault, evidence index, gap/owner tracker, response workflow and annual data refresh.
Buyer: UK/EU-facing SME suppliers that answer enterprise procurement, CSRD/VSME or customer ESG questionnaires.
Where it is sold: Accountants, sustainability advisers, procurement consultants, trade bodies, LinkedIn and supplier-development programmes.
Startup cost: £25–£100 | Time to launch: 1–2 weeks
Revenue model: Initial fact-library build plus annual/quarterly update and per-questionnaire support. | Activity model: ACTIVE with recurring annual updates
Why now: SME suppliers face repeated sustainability data requests while VSME and value-chain rules are pushing the market toward proportionate, reusable evidence structures.
Differentiation: Focuses on source-controlled answers and efficient reuse; it does not calculate unverifiable footprints, assure reports or sell generic ESG policies.
First-customer route: Create a 20-field synthetic fact-library sample and ask trade-body members or accountant clients which buyer questionnaires repeat most often.
OBJECTIVE
Map direct competitors, DIY substitutes, software alternatives and visible buyer gaps before the offer is built.
INFORMATION TO ANALYSE
Use only evidence I paste, clearly named public sources, client-approved material and the following track-specific research plan:
Use current EFRAG VSME material, EU/UK procurement requirements, buyer questionnaires supplied by clients, utility invoices, HR records, policies and qualified carbon/accounting work. Keep source/date/owner for every answer.
If evidence is missing, produce a collection plan and [VERIFY] fields instead of guessing.
TRACK-SPECIFIC EXECUTION DIRECTION
Use current EFRAG VSME material, EU/UK procurement requirements, buyer questionnaires supplied by clients, utility invoices, HR records, policies and qualified carbon/accounting work. Keep source/date/owner for every answer.
STEPS TO FOLLOW
1. Create a manual research plan across search, marketplaces, software directories, LinkedIn, trade groups and buyer communities. 2. Ask me to paste live findings. 3. Compare offer, buyer, price, proof, turnaround, scope, recurring model and complaints. 4. Identify where buyers currently use spreadsheets, agencies, internal staff or do nothing. 5. Rank gaps by evidence and ease of serving. 6. Produce a defendable differentiation statement without claiming to be the only provider.
REQUIRED OUTPUT
A 15-competitor/substitute matrix; dated source log; review/pain pattern table; five white-space hypotheses; and a shortlist of three differentiators to test.
Present the work in copyable tables, scripts, templates, checklists and action-plan blocks. Fill known variables and leave unknown variables visibly labelled.
TRACK-SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE / QUALITY BOUNDARY
Do not calculate or assure emissions without qualified methods, invent ESG claims, greenwash, or state compliance. Handle commercially sensitive and workforce data securely and obtain client approval before answering buyers.
KPI SET
Track: paid libraries, questionnaires mapped, approved answers reused, completion time reduced, gaps closed, annual renewals, adviser referrals and unsupported claims prevented
STAG VAULT CROSS-SELLS
Reference these existing resources where useful rather than recreating them: Track 58 Compliance Calendar, Track 108 Corporate RFP Writer, Track 136 Supplier Onboarding and Track 44 Niche Data Vaults.
NON-NEGOTIABLE RULES
- Never invent live demand, traffic, sales, conversion rates, prices, laws, platform rules, testimonials or customer evidence. Mark unknowns [VERIFY] and give the exact source or experiment needed.
- Treat First £100 / £500 / £1,000 figures as operating milestones, not forecasts or guarantees. Separate revenue, costs, tax, refunds and owner time.
- Use public, permissioned or client-supplied information only. Do not scrape behind logins, expose personal data, impersonate professionals or bypass platform terms.
- Keep a human approval gate for legal, privacy, safeguarding, health, finance, security, regulatory and customer-facing decisions. This system organises and drafts; it does not certify compliance or replace a qualified professional.
- Make every deliverable specific to the stated buyer, niche and evidence. Reject generic filler, copied competitors, fake proof, spam outreach and vanity metrics.
- Prioritise a cheap validation test before a full build. Stop or revise when the pre-agreed evidence threshold is not reached.
Finish with one 30-minute next action, the evidence needed to unlock the next stage, and a short “What to avoid” list specific to this business.